A Revenue Collector's Blog

I purchased this cover not for the patriotic aspect, but rather the improper revenue use. Yes, I realize that there is no way to know whether the paste-on is contemporaneous with the postal use or was added on after the fact. The paste-on does not cover the manuscript address. Cover is reduced slightly at right. I’ve been able to track down similar printed imagery from both patriotic stationery and lettersheets, but nothing that is an exact match. I don’t have…

Read More Read More

Improper uses of match & medicine revenues don’t come around as often as I’d like, far more scarce than improper uses of postage stamps on documents from the period. Two documents: Scott #RS194a and #R3c, both improperly used as documentaries on an 1865 invoice for medical attendance, medicine, and interest. Scott #RS195a improperly used on an 1868 receipt for payment for 4 gravestones. Both RS are from D. Ransom in Buffalo, NY., producer of “Dr. D. Ransom’s King of the…

Read More Read More

The early (pre-“red” era) large-denomination documentaries that were printed in strips of 4, for the most part are not scarce as individual stamps. Intact strips of 4, on the other hand, can be quite elusive… uncut examples even more so. This lot came up on Hipstamp and so I made an offer, and it was accepted. Scott # R246, $30 Grant, catalogues $13 for an uncut single (2.25 for cut-canceled singles), but the uncut strip of 4 is unvalued. Idiotically,…

Read More Read More

The document itself is a bit soiled, but beggars can’t be choosers. This is a 2-cent Express receipt dated February 14, 1863, from the General Express Forwarding House and Collection Agency (combining Howard & Co’s Express, Harnden Express, and Howard Express Co.). The revenue stamp affixed is the 2-cent Express in blue, part perforate, imperforate vertically (Scott #R9b). Per Mike Mahler: This tax was in effect only six months, from October 1, 1862, to March 31, 1863, moreover the requisite…

Read More Read More

I don’t recall having seen a bank or other entity retaining the same design for checks (or in this case drafts), for as long of a timeframe… almost 10 years spanning adhesive revenues and numerous RN imprints. The added bonus is that the engraved vignettes are extremely attractive. If anyone has any examples of the same document design but with different RN imprints than shown below, please let me know. I’d love to “complete the set.”

There’s an old adage amongst experienced collectors that goes something like “It’s not the items I overpaid for that I regret the most, but rather the items I didn’t overpay for that got away.” It took me a number of years to realize that this is incredibly true. When we start collecting and are typically on a tight budget, either as children or as someone just dipping a toe in the water, and most of our collecting circle are also…

Read More Read More

We can posit that certain plate varieties of stamps should theoretically exist, however until an example turns up in the wild, any discussion of rarity or value is moot. For example, many of the plate varieties on Scott R15c (1st issue 2-cent USIR) should also exist on R15d (silk paper), differing plate states and printing timeframes notwithstanding. Varieties of R13c (2-cent Proprietary, blue) may exist on R13d (silk paper), R13e (ultramarine), and R14c (2c Proprietary, orange)… and the list goes…

Read More Read More

Admittedly, this stamp is likely not a big deal to anyone but the most ardent of plate variety collectors, but when I saw it at an MSDA show last year I just had to buy it. It appears to be a garden variety example of Scott #R115a, the invert of the 2nd issue 50-cent documentary. Centering is kinda “meh” although it’s nice in that it’s not punch canceled or punch-and-filled like so many frequently are. I initially glossed over it,…

Read More Read More

The late Jim Drummond absolutely loathed the term “sewing machine perforations” understandably, as these privately made perforations were most likely not done on sewing machines. He and I would occasionally spar about the issue, as I viewed it as a descriptive term, not necessarily a technically accurate term. Philatelists know what you mean when you use the term, even if the perforations were made by various rotary perf wheels, etc. Mike Morrissey’s response to Jim’s article in the Q1 2016…

Read More Read More

So there I was at home doing some paperwork on Friday, and the phone rings. It’s Denny “Finder of the Unfindable” Peoples. He says “So are you coming to the show? People are asking about you.” The show he was referring to was the St. Louis Stamp Expo this past weekend. I had to remind him that I hadn’t been to that show in almost 15 years. “Well, I brought your stuff and a piece you’re really going to want.”…

Read More Read More

I’ve been going down a rabbit hole on the Scott # RL series stamps over the past several months, and as a result, I’ve put together a reference page that goes over the history, relevant authorization, etc. I discuss the (in my opinion) spurious RL1 bisects (Scott #RL1b). I’ve also started maintaining censuses of items of interest to me: Multiples (pairs, blocks, strips). Unlisted in Scott and seemingly far more scarce than one would think. Plate number captures and singles….

Read More Read More

I picked this up from Denny Peoples at the MSDA show in Indianapolis on Saturday. The price made me wince a bit, but it’s one of the most visually attractive improper use covers I’ve seen. P.S. Sent from Minster, Ohio at 7AM on July 13 and received in Chicago at 11:20PM the same day. Boy is THAT a thing of the past…

This isn’t philatelic in nature, but I consider it “proprietary medicine adjacent” as it is an advertising broadside for “Dr. Solon Osmond Richardson’s Jaundice Bitters”. I don’t know when exactly it was printed; the latest date printed on it is 1840. It is printed on tissue paper, approximately 9.5 x 14 inches. I’ve previously only ever seen reprints of this, never an original. Yes, it’s toned and creased and torn, but it is essentially in once piece, which is amazing…

Read More Read More

These are always fun discussions. So, this revenue document lot came up for auction on eBay, and I set a snipe and waited. It’s now on its way (confirmed via tracking progress), so it’s safe to discuss it. The total cost of this lot including shipping and sales tax was $88. What do you think I saw that captured my interest? What is the max you would pay for said lot and why? (Could be higher or lower than what…

Read More Read More

I picked this item up from Denny Peoples at the Indianapolis MSDA show back in November. It’s actually far more interesting (IMO) than initially meets the eye. The 1932 check tax, as discussed by Robert Patterson and Bob Hohertz in the Fourth Quarter 2012 issue of The American Revenuer, was a very unpopular 2-cent tax that went into effect on June 16, 1932 and lasted through the end of 1934. It was extremely regressive during a period where the country…

Read More Read More

I pointed this out to Eric and Richard at Chicagopex, and later during the show Mike Morissey emailed pointing out the same thing. This collection being offered at an estimate of $5,000 to $7,000 is egregious. Fully half of the collection is comprised of fake/fantasy cancels. Seems like no one at Siegel did ANY vetting of the material. It’s lot 1016 in Sale 1367. I include the images from their PDF below, and I have watermarked “BOGUS!” on the pages…

Read More Read More

Well, not really, but there had to have been a reason… One of the more unusual uses I’ve seen of a baggage stamp. The tying cancel appears to be the norm, based upon other examples of the stamp I’ve seen, so no reason to believe it is contrived. It surely can’t have been typical, otherwise we would see more examples… I wonder what the rationale was. Speculation from another collector: Perhaps the book fell out of someone’s bag or luggage,…

Read More Read More

I’ve always wanted a Scott #R13e (2c Proprietary, ultramarine, CV = $400) used on document for my improper use collection. I’d never seen any in over 25 years. Mike Mahler’s document book states 2 known on-document uses recorded as of 1999. One came up in one of Eric Jackson’s 3-week auctions and I decided to bid. I can never predict what things will sell for there. There are times when things go for a fraction of what they should, and…

Read More Read More

I spotted these documents in the group lot I bought from Wayne Gehret at Indypex, but I didn’t spend a lot of time examining them in the moment. I just know that *ANY* 1862-dated revenue-stamped document is of interest. It’s a group of three probate of will documents from Ross County, Ohio, dated November 3, October 18, and October 10, 1862… EXTREMELY early. All are franked with 50-cent Probate of Will imperforate stamps, so EMUs (early matching usages) since that…

Read More Read More

Friday morning at 6:30 in the AFM I jumped in my car and set off for INDYPEX, this being the second year at the new location, now located to the west of Indianapolis proper rather than east. Great for me, as it shaves off just about a half hour from the drive each way. It still ended up being about 2 hours, no thanks to the [HEAVILY CENSORED] road construction on the Peoples Republic of Illinois side of the border….

Read More Read More

[For those who got the reference, congratulations!… you’re old like me.] The other day I was chatting with Denny Peoples, and he was telling about a great revenue stockbook he had gotten, some of the items he had pulled out to add to inventory, and that the remainder would be a great lot for me to break down for eBay. Since I would see him at Indypex on the 19th, I could see it then. But if there’s anything I…

Read More Read More

Just ask anyone who’s met me! Philatelically however… I recall reading this thread a number of years back on exposed screwheads being inked in margins of battleship revenues: https://www.stampcommunity.org/topi…pic_id=42772 Since then, I’ve kept an eye out for examples at shows and online, but have struck out. I missed out on a couple on eBay since I didn’t notice them until after the fact: Fast forward to earlier this week. I stopped by Denny Peoples’ house in Indianapolis since I hadn’t…

Read More Read More

Admittedly, the deeper back-of-book revenue stamps are not my strong suit. I have representative examples of certain types, or where cancels or documents catch my eye for one reason or another, but I don’t do a “deep dive” when it comes to their creation or usage. That said, I see enough of them at shows, in live auctions, and online, just because they are revenue items, that I think I have at least developed a sense for what might be…

Read More Read More

Well, no not really. However it’s the first doubled strike I’ve seen of this cancel. Handstamp cancels show up now and then with doubled strikes, but letterpress typeset cancels far less frequently, as it means the entire sheet of stamps was fed through the press twice. Yes, the stamp is a bit munged, but it’s a neat piece nonetheless.

My 3 lots from Saturday’s automated online auction at Siegel came in. Initially, I was somewhat disappointed in that I didn’t get the top 2 lots I originally wanted, but with further time to reflect, I’m happy with the way things turned out. Had I gotten the first lot I wanted, I would never have bid on what turned out to be the best lot I ended up with. All 3 lots I won had aspects to them that made…

Read More Read More

While my primary collecting focus is revenue stamps of the 19th century, and I give 20th century material comparatively short shrift, there is one stamp (2 stamps actually) that have piqued my curiosity: Scott # R733-734, the last two documentary stamps issued by the U.S., issued in 1962 and 1963 respectively. This discussion focuses primarily on Scott #R733, as it generated the most hoopla and collector interest, whereas the subseququent #R734 a year later (removal of the text “ESTABLISHED 1862”)…

Read More Read More

This is a wonderful item, IMO. Another example of how searching outside of the normal stamps category on eBay can pay dividends. It’s Scott # RU4a used improperly as a documentary on an 1869 one-day promissory note, tied by manuscript cancel in the same hand that wrote the note. The manuscript cancel is “TK AP 6 1869”, the unusual month abbreviation matching that used at upper right. 5 cents was the correct tax rate for this transaction. Mann’s Choice is…

Read More Read More

I’ve seen items like this once or twice before over the years, but they don’t come around frequently, in my experience. This is an 1899 check drawn on the Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., with a printed slip attached by the revenue stamp (the slip itself has no adhesive), which reads “TWO CENTS added to this check for Revenue Stamp required by United States law.” You can see the pencil notation for “Stamp 02” above the check amount.

Likely more of interest to advertising cover specialists or bicycle history enthusiasts than revenue collectors, but I just loved the aesthetics. Sent from one of the proprietors of Schwind & Garrabrant to himself. We know with certainty that it was philatelic due to the whimsical message on the enclosed matching letterhead: Friend Walter This is your Birthday so I thought I would write a few lines to myself wishing myself a happy return of the day and try to get…

Read More Read More

The most well-known double transfers on R13c (2-cent Proprietary) are the T13 and T13a… but they are not the most dramatic (just as the T15 and T15a are IMO not the most dramatic double transfers on R15c). However the double transfers that completely cover the stamp come around much less frequently than the T13 or T13a. The 4 different positions of what I would call all-over double transfer that I am aware of are probably an order of magnitude more…

Read More Read More

[I don’t know what the takeaway is from all of this, and there is definitely some conjecture on my part, but it was an interesting rabbit hole to go down…] I have maintained a census of Scott #R15e (2-cent USIR on green paper) for about 10 years, since I first discovered one in an eBay lot and obtained a clean PF cert on it. I subsequently found a second one, which also got a clean PF cert. It’s a very…

Read More Read More

I picked this up from Denny Peoples’ “pick-n-pay” box at the MSDA show in Kenosha, WI a few weeks ago. There’s nothing remarkable about either the stamp or the document itself, but that handwriting/penmanship is something else…

One for my improper use collection, and definitely one of the more colorful combinations of stamps. They apparently ran out of 1-cent documentaries (this was early in the tax period and on the west coast, so it’s plausible) and so put together proprietary battleships in an amount adding up to the missing cent (5/8c + 1/4c + 1/8c). There isn’t any ready indication that this is contrived, in my opinion.

The Scott-listed T13a double transfer has been in the catalogue (and partially shown) for many, many years. What I never realized until about 11 years ago was that there are actually 3 plate positions associated with this double transfer. The stamps immediately above and below the full T13a also exhibit doubling: Plate position 133 (the stamp above the full T13a) only shows doubled elements at the bottom of the stamp Plate position 147 (the full T13a showing doubling of both…

Read More Read More

I know that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, but to me this piece is stunning.

I’ve never seen anything like this. It’s a photostat of a 1902 homestead deed from the Muskogee (Creek) Nation, Indian Territory, filed with the department of Interior on August 22, 1916, with a handstamp cancel from the ‘Five Civilized Tribes’. The handstamped statement next to the revenue stamp reads as follows: DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT FOR THE FIVE CIVILIZED TRIBES, MUSKOGEE, OKLAHOMA This is to certify that I am the officer having custody of the records…

Read More Read More

This is the only revenue stamped baggage ticket I’ve encountered. Presumably these were pretty ephemeral and not typically saved. It’s a “Freight Receipt and Agreement” from the West Penn Railways Company with a printed faux signature of “Williston Fish” (great name!), vice president of the railway, with a 1-cent documentary revenue stamp, punch cancelled. Per Ron Lesher, this tax was only in place for 13 months, from December 1, 1914 through the end of 1915. Therefore, the date this ticket…

Read More Read More

I’m slowly wading into the cartons and cartons of acquisitions over the last decade that I’ve never imaged or added to my website, and it occasionally prompts thoughts of “Boy, I can’t recall the last time I saw [item] available for sale anywhere!” This is a prime example. The tobacco sale tax stamps are not highly valued in Scott as used stamps. The value for a complete used set of RJ1-RJ11 (the entirety of the stamp type) is $37.45. Finding…

Read More Read More

I initially thought this might be an improper use of a revenue stamp as postage, but upon examining the postcard and reading the notation, it is not, but still a neat history piece, so I bought it anyway. It is a postcard sent from San Francisco, California, to Basel, Switzerland, on September 2, 1898. Per images of other international postcards from 1898, the proper 5 cents postage was paid outside the revenue stamp (Scott # R155, large provisional I.R. overprint)….

Read More Read More

Browsing eBay, I see a wide variety of postage due bills and top-of-stack sheets, cards, and envelopes from different eras. Many have postage due stamps affixed, but others have regular postage stamps, air mail, special delivery etc. Presumably these were primarily for business senders (business reply mail) where the amounts were fairly large and/or encompassing a large number of pieces had postage due and this was more expedient than affixing stamps to individual pieces. Were there regulations or limitations as…

Read More Read More

I still take the time to go through dealer junk/bargain boxes at shows because you never know what you might find. At the MSDA show this past weekend in Glen Ellyn, IL, I spent the first hour and a half going through a dealer’s tubs of bargain material (“bargain” relatively speaking, as items were typically $5-10 each), as two of the tubs had a large amount of U.S. and Canadian revenue documents. The vast majority was material that was of…

Read More Read More

Well, I didn’t expect to go to a stamp show on Saturday, but it just turned out that way. I had a meeting in Fort Wayne, Indiana, which is about a 3.5 hour drive each way. The meeting went way shorter than I expected, so I needed to figure out what to do with the rest of my day. Since the drive home took me right past Indianapolis, I checked online to see if there was anything going on. Lo…

Read More Read More

I’ve been focused on nonphilatelic endeavors for the last 8-9 months, so my posting here has been pretty sparse. I hope to be engaging more with my revenue collection moving forward. Am working full-time May through September, so no show excursions, but I picked up a few interesting things recently, all on eBay. First, a lovely 1866 marriage certificate featuring a Scott #65 used improperly as a revenue stamp. Doubly illegal, as even had the payment been correctly made with…

Read More Read More

Back in 2015 I became aware of a then unlisted large plate scratch on Scott #R33c (10-cent Certificate). Karl Lachemacher had it (and still has it, as far as I am aware), but we weren’t aware of a confirming example at the time. In order for something to be considered a “plate variety” rather than just a “printing anomaly”, there has to be a confirming example showing that the variety is persistent. A confirming example of the exact plate scratch…

Read More Read More

The beautiful scenic underprint in a second color is what initially caught my attention, but additionally the level of detail with respect to paying the tax is quite interesting IMO. Across the top: “A revenue stamp must be affixed to this note by the signer and cancelled according to law.” At left: “For every $100 or fraction thereof, a five ct. Revenue Stamp must be affixed. Place Stamp Here.” You typically don’t see this level of instruction printed on a…

Read More Read More

… and this one is lovely. An 1866 stock certificate for 40 shares of the New England Screw Steamship Co. Issued to and signed by the president of the company. Not only do you have a steamship vignette at center, but a hammered strike of the company seal which also depicts a steamship and port dock.

The implementation dates for taxes make for interesting transaction documents, both immediately before and after that date. This IMO is one of them. Check written on June 6, 1898. First day of tax was July 1, 1898. Presumably this was presented for payment on or after July 1 (see date stamp on reverse), so 2 cents tax was due. I initially thought that the person at the bank retroactively dated the tax stamp to align with the original date the…

Read More Read More

These apparently were offered by the same seller on eBay over several months. All on document fragments from the same company, the Northern Assurance Co. of London, all used in July of 1898. From Frank Sente: … I’m not sure how much help I can be with these. I’m not familiar with the Northern Assurance Co of London and haven’t seen usages on any of their insurance documents. However, 1/2c is a VALID 1898 insurance rate. Accident, Fire, Liability, and…

Read More Read More

Sometimes it’s the cancels. The Benton’s Pine Tree Tar Troches cancel is, in my opinion, one of the two most famous pictoral cancels on U.S. 1st issue revenues, along with the Poland’s Magic Powders mortar & pestle cancel. As I was perusing the recent proprietary cancel collection at INDYPEX, it contained numerous examples of the Benton cancel on various stamps, including one that was marked as a counterfeit cancel. I initially passed it over, as I did on my return…

Read More Read More

I had been meaning to get material written up and added to my website, but I am soooooooo far behind just due to RL issues and obligations that I don’t know how soon it will happen, so in the interim I’m doing a brief photo dump. Most of this material came from two sources: (1) a series of eBay auctions held by the same seller back in February, and (2) pieces from a collection that Denny Peoples purchased at an…

Read More Read More

While it’s not unusual to encounter bank checks feature branding, logos, trademarks, etc., this is the most exteme example of advertising I’ve encountered to date, featuring advertising content on both front and back of the check. I’m surprised that such a practice was deemed legal.

tl;dr: When you encounter something that is extremely scarce/rare, with an extant population in single digits, beggars can’t be choosers. Do you pick up an example that has condition issues, or do you pass it by in hopes of finding a better one? What if it is a discovery example? I picked up the document below from Denny Peoples when he set up at our local show last month. It has issues, but as far as I know it is…

Read More Read More

Well… sort of. One is from the proprietary collection I purchased at the show, that had I left the show 30 minutes sooner on Sunday, I never would have even seen, and the second is actually from Eric Jackson’s 3-week auction that had ended the Tuesday before the show and I asked him to bring it rather than mailing it. The first document is an unsevered 1872 Second and Third of Exchange from the “Triple-Currency Exchange”, Bowles Brothers & Co.,…

Read More Read More

Obviously this never went through the mail; presumably it was enclosed in a letter, a magazine issue, or given out as a promotional piece. The Philatelic West ceased publication in 1930, so presumably this parcel tag was created in the teens or 1920s. So most definitely NOT an actual improper use of a revenue stamp as postage, but it ties to my collecting interests nonetheless. P.S. Love the British Guiana fantasy cancel.

Sometimes when you encounter something rare, you can’t be a stickler about condition. Sure, condition factors into what you’re willing to pay, but ultimately at the end of the day you have to make a firm decision as to whether any faults or flaws are significant enough to dissuade you from acquiring the item… while knowing full well that if you pass it by there is likely never to be another. Such was the case when this item came up…

Read More Read More

Both Scott R173b and R174a are horizontal pairs that are imperforate vertically between the stamps. I have yet to personally see an example of Scott R173a, which is a vertical pair imperforate horizontally. The only example I can find record of is from the 2006 Cunliffe Collection auction held by Spink. In the global scheme of things these don’t catalogue for very much ($325 for R173b and $500 for R174a respectively), yet one doesn’t encounter them frequently. I’ve only seen…

Read More Read More

CDVs, tintypes, and other photographs taxed during the 2-year period (August 1, 1864 through July 31, 1866) that photos were subject to tax during the Civil War tax era are not uncommon. This, however, is the first item of this format I’ve seen. I acquired it in a trade with another collector who specializes in photo-related material. It is a 7-inch x 4-inch glass slide in wooden frame, referred to as a ‘Magic Lantern’ slide, a predecessor of the slide…

Read More Read More

One of my main collecting specializations is illegal/improper cross-usages: U.S. postage stamps used as revenues on documents U.S. revenue stamps used as postage on cover Non-documentary revenues used as documentaries on documents Unlike the case with other countries, cross usage of these stamps was technically illegal in the U.S., so these usages are not common and are highly sought after. It is the exact opposite of stamps of the British Commonwealth, for example, where revenue cancels and usages are NOT…

Read More Read More

I had looked at these three revenue-imprinted (RN) checks before, but never side by side. The first two are both examples of RN-B5, the revenue imprint being printed in metallic bronze ink. The third is RN-B3 with the imprint in blue. What I never noticed without comparing them side by side is that the signature of C. C. Parks was not done by hand. It’s printed as part of each check! Very unusual IMO.

The recent offering of the purported “first” penny black ever printed and the resulting discussion/debate ties directly into a piece I just acquired a few days ago. I just returned from my first trip back east in over 20 years to visit family. On that trip I visited Eric Jackson’s store in Leesport PA, and he was gracious enough to allow me to loot and pillage through piles of unworked material. To say it was an enjoyable experience would be…

Read More Read More

A lovely unexpected surprise, found in a junk lot I got from Denny Peoples at a 1-day Indiana show last month. On its face it looks run-of-the-mill… but it most definitely isn’t. For whatever reason, the 1-cent stock transfers and particularly RD1 are very scarce on document. One can look through thousands of these slips (and I have cumulatively) and never see one. Presumably it’s because the 1c would only ever been used as a make-up stamp rather than solo,…

Read More Read More

As some may know, one of my collecting focuses is illegal/improper usages related to U.S. revenue stamps: 1. Postage stamps used as revenue stamps on documents 2. Revenue stamps used as postage on cover. Primarily 19th century material, but also bleeding into the early 20th century. The vast majority of my collection in this area is postage stamps used as revenues, some 200+ documents at this point. The number of covers with revenue stamps used as postage is considerably smaller,…

Read More Read More

… not to mention rare. Documents from the U.S. Civil War era that feature both U.S. revenue stamps and revenue stamps/imprints from other countries are quite scarce, and depending on the countries in question, outright rare. I stumbled across this document on eBay where it had sat for over 3 months, in a category revenue collectors wouldn’t have normally looked, being sold by a seller in Spain, with no reference in the title about there being U.S. revenue stamps affixed….

Read More Read More

… at least based upon the catalog values of the stamps. If the stamps are of nominal value used, then presumably they were used in large quantities, so why don’t we necessarily see them very often still on documents? This is similar to the threads I’ve made about Scott #J68, the half-cent postage due, of nominal value used, yet try finding one on cover or card paying a fractional cent rate. They’re tough; any example is a $25+ item, with…

Read More Read More

My eyes and brain keep playing tricks on me. Depending on what/how I look at this stamp, I can see two impressions offset NE to SW with respect to one another, but if I look at other elements it just looks like ink spread. Thoughts? Image is 3200dpi, so you may want to open it in a new window to see it larger. From Bart Rosenberg: This is not the double impression, which is much more obvious. This is more…

Read More Read More

Scott #R12c, the orange 2-cent Playing Cards 1st issue revenue stamp is of moderate catalog value at $55.00. Multiples, on the other hand, are incredibly scarce, with the catalog value of a pair being $500.00 in italics. The Curtis Census listed a total of 8 multiples of any size: a reconstructed block of 4, an L-shaped block of 3, a strip of 3, 4 horizontal pairs and 1 vertical pair. I stumbled across the following pair on eBay running as…

Read More Read More

I had read somewhere that PSE is doing all expertizing inhouse now rather than sending material out to Eric, Richard, and other recognized revenue experts. Well, that certainly appears to be the case. These two “genuine” certs are egregious. If you truly want valid opinions and certs that actually mean a whit in the marketplace when it comes to U.S. revenues, for the love of everything holy, do NOT send them to PSE. Good grief! For those not well versed…

Read More Read More

Oops… no sorry, not that kind of pawn. Stamped pawn tickets from the Civil War era are extremely rare; only a handful are known to exist. Why is that? Well, simply put: nobody saved them… there was no reason to. Once a pawn loan was repaid or the decision made to give up the pawned items, there was no longer a reason to keep a pawn ticket. Stamped legal and financial transaction documents, on the other hand, were retained by…

Read More Read More

Whilst perusing the Bay of E last week, I stumbled across this item with 7 minutes left in the auction. Talk about providence smiling upon me! This ticks so many boxes… illegal/improper usage… bisects… great aesthetics. It reminds me of philatelic covers from the early 20th century where enterprising stamp collectors would bisect 2 separate stamps and position the bisects aesthetically. However, this is the first revenue-related item I’ve seen where this was the practice. I’ve never seen a comparable…

Read More Read More

Normally, part perf and imperf usages later than early-to-mid-1864 set off alarm bells for possible shenanigans as they were virtually all used up by that point. The major exception are the Late Date West Coast imperfs and part perfs. I’ve written about those before. Genuine imperfs and part perfs can be found with California, Oregon, and Washington cancels as late as 1870. The East Coast is a different matter entirely. By the mid-1860s, virtually all imperfs and part perfs were…

Read More Read More

Every now and then I become enamored with a certain stamp type or cancel type, whether I find it aesthetically pleasing, interesting, or I feel the catalogue value doesn’t accurately reflect its actual scarcity. The “sewing machine perforated” stamps of the 2nd issue (R112c, R115c, R120a) get all of the attention as they are the sewing machine perfs most commonly seen in the marketplace (R120a notwithstanding, as it is the most scarce of all of the Scott-listed sewing machine perf…

Read More Read More

This cover showed up in Eric Jackson’s most recent auction. I was interested in it as it’s the first RB30 (4-cent proprietary battleship) I’ve seen used illegally/improperly as postage on cover. It’s slightly out of period, so I didn’t think it would go that high, but boy was I wrong. A battle ensued and I ended up bidding more than 3 times what I originally expected to in order to win it. *wince* But as they say, if it’s something…

Read More Read More

I recently purchased a small bulk lot of common U.S. revenue stamps on eBay, and in it there were about 1000 Scott # R152a and R152b (no R152c sadly), and decided to use it as an opportunity to do some flyspecking. I’ve not seen any definitive references to plate varieties on R152; it wasn’t included in the Shift Hunter Letters. There have been a couple of brief articles in The American Revenuer, showcased below. For each stamp I show an…

Read More Read More

This pair of documents appeared together on eBay last week. I put in a snipe, somewhat fearful of what the lot might go for, but I guess people were busy or missed it, as the lot ended up finishing nowhere near what I expected. It’s a pair of drafts from the National Black River Bank in Proctorsville, Vermont, each with a 2-cent postage stamp used illegally as a revenue stamp, tied with handstamp cancel. One went through uncaught, whereas the…

Read More Read More

We’ve had discussions about removing stamps from documents and covers, and how it’s generally not recommended for 19th-century pieces unless the document/cover is tattered, incomplete, or remaining intact runs further risk of destabilization.But what about stamps on pieces or covers or documents that are only partially complete? Then it becomes a bit more discretionary, especially if the stamps themselves are quite nice. It’s quite plausible that one or more stamps removed from a cover or document could have higher appeal…

Read More Read More

Sometimes the related nonphilatelic items are just as interesting (or even more interesting) than the stamped items themselves. Exhibitors frequently seek out these items to add context and/or flavor to their exhibits. I don’t exhibit, so to me they’re just “cool related items”. Here are some examples that I’ve picked up over time. 1. This tattered illegal use cover was part of a group lot of illegal usages offered on eBay in April of this year. All were either out-of-period…

Read More Read More

In the section for “Power of Attorney, Voting” in Mike Mahler’s book U.S. Revenue-Stamped Documents of the Civil War Era, the first example he shows is a Voting Proxy from the Quincy Mining Company, the specific description and image as follows: Quote: Form authorizing T.F. Mason to vote as proxy for Emeline Aldrich and Caroline Bassett at meetings of stockholders of the Quincy Mining Co., stamped with 10-cent Power of Attorney part perforate horizontal pair (perf between), manuscript cancel dated…

Read More Read More

R7b doesn’t exist. Best case scenario, this was done privately, not officially. Certainly the nature of the perforations indicates it was not done on a normal perforator. I thought it was interesting enough to put in a snipe and won it for a nominal bid. It’s an early cancel, and during this period some companies were looking for ways to make imperfs easier to use. See, for example, the sewing machine perforations on R19a and the privately rouletted 1st issues…

Read More Read More

It’s a little worse for wear, but this is only the second solo usage of a half-cent battleship documentary I have seen in person, the first being one I posted here last year. It is an 1899 2-day traveler’s accidental death and injury policy from The Travelers Insurance Company. The full name of the railroad(s) in the cancel is Lake Shore & Michigan Southern and Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railways. I’m assuming that rather than it being a combined…

Read More Read More

Great aesthetic piece and quite scarce. It came with a writeup tracing the journey and taxation of the document. I don’t know how accurate all elements are of the writeup, but someone put some effort into it.

At first glance this looks like a nondescript illegal usage, a bit beat up, likely a $10-15 item at retail. But the timing is curious. It’s dated February 21, 1891… but that stamp wasn’t issued until 1894. Unless it’s a contrived item, the only thing I can think of is that it was retroactively taxed at the time the check was submitted for payment, some 3+ years later. The reverse shows nothing except for the endorsement of the payee, presumably…

Read More Read More

This small check collection was in Eric Jackson’s auction this week, and while it cost me more than I had hoped, I was willing to stretch a bit for it. It traces the use of 2-cent revenue stamps from the advent of the tax in October 1862 through the late 1860s through the lens of a single company’s checks. The checks themselves are great aesthetically, having been printed in two contrasting colors. Additionally it has an example from the second…

Read More Read More

Not entirely sure what the story is here. Horizontal pair of R196 or R207 used illegally for postage on a December 1914 cover. The cover appears to have originated in McKinney, Texas, althrough there is no return address, addressed to recipient in Mississippi. I’m not sure how it routed through Mexico though. It was caught by the Mexican (postal?) authorities. The violet handstamp reads: Recibida en el Departamento de Rezagos sin la estampilla correspondiente. Which per Google translates to: Received…

Read More Read More

When I saw this document in the weekly Kelleher internet auction, I was immediately enamored with it, as I had not seen anything similar. The only thing that gave me pause was the opening bid, as it wasn’t cheap. I vacillated between bidding and not bidding, but ultimately I bid on it, remembering the old truism about almost always regretting the things we didn’t purchase more so than those we did. If I could recall seeing another example in the…

Read More Read More

It’s easy to get so focused on the details of an item that something obvious just gets missed entirely. In this case, it wasn’t just the seller, but also all the other bidders on an item that missed it, as I won the item at a completely bargain price. Listing description: Battleship Documentary R165 large block — low start price! Battleship Documentary R165 large block. Mint, OG, in mount. there are 2 small hinge reinforcements on the back. This block…

Read More Read More

This one’s a bit of a head-scratcher. If anyone can lend any insight, I would appreciate it. Below is one of the pages from Bruce Baryla’s award-winning Civil War Sun Tax exhibit (exhibit in its entirety can be seen at web.newsguy.com/bruceb/london/exhibit01.htm ). When Bruce broke up the exhibit in 2013, I acquired this page along with many other items from the exhibit. Along with that CDV, he also had a second CDV showing another portion of the same cancel. Here…

Read More Read More

I saw this on eBay as one of those auction + best offer listings with about a day left and no bids, so I made an offer below the starting bid, it was countered and we came to an agreement. This (relatively) new format of auction + offer is a case where snipers are actually at a disadvantage since the seller could come to agreement before the auction ends, as happened here. It’s a vertical block of 10 of R58a,…

Read More Read More

I’ve always had a thing for revenue double impressions. However, outside of the 1st issue double impressions, many revenue DI, especially those of the 20th century, are somewhat “meh” in terms of dramatic appeal. Especially in the documentary and proprietary issues, some of the doubling is so minute that unless you’re examining the stamp under high magnification you can’t actually see the doubling; it just looks like a poorly inked stamp… in fact many dealers and eBay sellers offer inking…

Read More Read More

Very interesting item. This is the first solo usage of a half-cent documentary battleship revenue stamp that I have seen. It appears to be a promotional 1-month accidental insurance policy from the agent A.B. Cilley in Boston, the policy itself from U.S. Casualty Co. Very innovative marketing idea!

It’s been a while since I posted anything new. I haven’t had much time for stamp collecting activities lately, and what little I’ve had hasn’t been spent on U.S. material (shocking!). Here are three CDVs from the 2-year taxation period (August 1, 1864 through July 31, 1866) that I found interesting for different reasons. First is a CDV that I purchased for the subject matter rather than the stamp or cancel, although the 2-cent orange Proprietary is a better stamp….

Read More Read More

Dagnab it, I had hoped that this horrific practice would not rear its ugly head in the revenues field. 🙁 As controversial as this opinion might be, were I a person of infinite means, I would buy up items like this and trim them down just to get these abominations off the market. Various opinions ensued: From stallzer: It’s the double whammy. Butchering of a multiple and grading of proofs. From StateRevs: Disgusting. From rogdcam: There is zero harm in…

Read More Read More

I picked these up from a few different sources. July 1, 1898 was the first day of the Spanish American War taxes. As with FDCs in the front of the book, first day of tax usages are highly collectible. Additionally, last day of tax usages are also frequently sought after. First, a check on the account of the Pittsfield Transportation Co., drawn on the Third National Bank of Pittsfield, Massachusetts. Next, a draft from the Banking House of Eavey, Lane…

Read More Read More

Finding verifiable 1st issue silk papers still on documents is a daunting proposition, as quite frequently you can only see the blue silk threads from the back of the stamp. Sure, you can sweat/steam the stamp from the document to check, and then replace it, but frankly I shy away from documents with stamps removed and replaced. I realize it is an accepted practice with covers, but I just don’t like it when a stamp has been removed and replaced….

Read More Read More

The Scott Specialized Catalogue states the following with respect to part perforates: Part perforate stamps are understood to be imperforate horizontally unless otherwise stated. Part perforate stamps with an asterisk (*) after the value exist imperforate horizontally or vertically. As a general rule, part perforate first issue revenues that are imperforate vertically are considerably scarcer than their imperforate horizontally counterparts. (Emphasis added). The difficulty with the last statement is that while the catalogue value represents the value in the “normal”…

Read More Read More

At CHICAGOPEX last month, I stopped by Labron Harris’s booth and asked whether he had any illegal usages of revenues as postage available, and he said “I’ve got an ugly one, but you might like it.” Well, he was right on both counts. Definitely not for the condition purist, as it has considerable… “character.” 😉 It’s a 1st Issue 5-cent Inland Exchange (R27c) used illegally as postage on an 1876 cover to England, caught, and assessed postage due, currently the…

Read More Read More

… or so it would seem at first glance. It would be real easy to blow right past these in a lot/accumulation if you weren’t paying close attention. This diagonal “A.E. Dougherty” cancel is actually not a manuscript cancel. In fact, given the precise match of the angle between the two stamps, these are likely printed cancels rather than handstamped. Additional examples would be needed to be more certain. The manuscript markings at left and right are interesting as well:…

Read More Read More

I’ve seen documents with these before, but I don’t know what to call them. This document was in a lot of illegal usages of postage stamps used as revenues, but I’m sure these are not revenue-related, as there was no revenue tax in effect in 1855. The bisect and quadrisect pieces are not initialed in any way, but are positioned right next to signatories to the document. So were these used in lieu of a notary embossed stamp? What is…

Read More Read More

… and yet I find it interesting nonetheless. Certed by the PF as having counterfeit IR overprints, this reconstructed full OG irregular block still makes for an interesting aesthetic piece. The original submitter apparently also included a 1981 PF cert of a (supposed) genuine used example of a Mt. Clemmens (Clemens?) provisional IR overprint. The only examples I could find at the PF are the certed used example and a single unused example similar to the block, deemed counterfeit. The…

Read More Read More

A recent lot acquired for my revenue illegal usage collection. J.D. Van Volkenburgh of Hamilton, Missouri owned a “post office book store” that sold “Books, Stationery, Cigars and Tobacco, Newspapers, and Periodicals”. He was an early member of the American Philatelic Society. The lot consists of 7 checks, starting with a nice 2-cent battleship documentary with margin marking. The remaining 7 checks are all comprised of a wide variety of PROPRIETARY battleship revenue stamps, affixed illegally. Because most of the…

Read More Read More

I picked this up for my illegal/improper usage collection. You occasionally will run across 1st issue Playing Cards and Proprietary types (the two types that were still required to only be used for matching transactions following the legislation change of December 1862 that allowed cross-transaction type usage) used as documentaries, but it’s almost always just a single or perhaps a pair, not in large quantities on a single document. This 1871 indenture contains a block of ten R15c and ten…

Read More Read More

This is an odd one. Purchased as a gamble/curiosity just to see more. Could be fabricated, although I’m not sure to what end. The price I paid wasn’t substantially more than what the bond would otherwise bring. It’s an attractive $1,000 railroad bond with a 50-cent battleship documentary affixed, with a 2-line 1899 handstamp cancel. It also has an orange British 1-pound embossed revenue stamp at left, also (I believe) dated 1899. The odd aspect is the block of 6…

Read More Read More

When I encountered this document on Eric Jackson’s website over the Independence Day weekend, I initially glossed over it as “meh, just another 2-cent banknote illegal usage”… but then I paused, reflected, and started looking through my records and my collection for a similar example… and couldn’t find one. It’s tied, which is nice; something you don’t always find, but what’s so special about it? This is actually the first example I have ever seen of one of the grilled…

Read More Read More

The Iron Cliffs Company drafts are well known in revenue collecting circles, most notably for their aesthetics and the wide variety of 1st-3rd issue revenue stamps that can be found affixed. Mike Mahler wrote extensively about a find of these in the November-December 1995 issue of The American Revenuer: http://tar.revenuer.org/TAR1995N10.pdf I’ve seen numerous examples offered both online and at shows, and have a couple in my yet-to-be-processed piles. However, until last week I had never seen one that had an…

Read More Read More

This one is a bit of a head-scratcher. It’s a Scott #71, 30-cent Ben Franklin, used illegally as a revenue on a receipt for purchase of $100 of stamps from the Wheeling, West Virginia post office, signed by the postmaster. The problem is that there would have been no reason to pay 30 cents tax on this transaction. The ink color and hand of the stamp’s cancel match that of the document, so it does not appear that this is…

Read More Read More

I picked this up at COMPEX this weekend. It purports to be a privately rouletted R27a. It’s on piece, unfortunately not large enough or with any printing to provide context. It appears that the upper left corner was severed by the diagonal cut exhibited by the underlying piece, and then reattached. It’s not the first 1st Issue private roulette I’ve seen. I have an R5a that also is privately rouletted: There is another rouletted R5a with a clean Philatelic Foundation…

Read More Read More

Per Mike Mahler’s essential book “A Catalog of United States Revenue-Stamped Documents of the Civil War Era by Type and Tax Rate” (1999, The American Revenue Association): Quote: Any bill of lading to a foreign port is a significant item… Of the seven EMUs listed, it is unfortunate that two are defective (the Maitland and 7/24/1863 Wattson items). At that time, he had recorded only 37 examples, of which 7 were early matching usages (mid-1863 or earlier). So when an…

Read More Read More

Recently, I’ve been actively bidding on various and sundry covers with illegal uses of revenue stamps as postage. It’s a bit of a minefield, as these covers are frequently contrived. Additionally, the competition is quite fierce; I’ve ended up being the underbidder, or my bids not even executing because they’re too short, quite a bit as of late. To those who lament the demise or malaise in philately, I say “phooey!” It all depends on the areas you collect. In…

Read More Read More

… and so is the case with this item, an agent’s certificate from the National Ink Co. issued December 21, 1865. The philatelic usage is mundane, although it’s nice to have a clear “N. Ink Co.” manuscript cancel. No in this case, it’s the certificate itself that has all the appeal. A patriotic eagle vignette, and more importantly 3-color printing in red, blue, and metallic gold. That level of expense was by far the exception rather than the rule in…

Read More Read More

“… who was busy with three boys of his own..” No wait… sorry, different Brady. 😉 Mathew Brady was one of the most, if not THE most, prolific photographer of the Civil War. CDVs (Carte de Visites, an early form of photograph) from his studio are highly collectible, as he (and his employees) photographed many military subjects, as well as unusual subjects of the era such as circus freaks, native americans, etc. The CDVs appeal to military history collectors, Civil…

Read More Read More

Well, it’s not really a first day cover, but it sort of is to me. This is the one lot in last week’s Siegel’s sessions that I was interested in. I wasn’t sure what the competition would be like, and as luck would have it I was the only bidder, so I was able to get it for about half of low estimate. The listing writeup was as follows: 2c Trans-Mississippi (286). Used with two each 3c and 5c Battleship…

Read More Read More

Several weeks ago, I got a card in the mail for the Indiana Stamp Club Spring Fair, and it coincided with the first weekend of my vacation, so I gave some thought to going. I gave Denny Peoples a call, as in all likelihood he’d be the dealer I’d be buying the most from. He said he didn’t have much for me, and that since it was a club show, I was unlikely to find much up my alley. He…

Read More Read More

Yeah, but I like it anyway. I wish it had more context. Unfortunately, not even the cancel gives us a clue as to usage. It’s part of an oversized envelope or parcel front, franked with $13,792.65 in revenue stamps (assuming there weren’t others elsewhere that got removed). 2 complete strips of 4 and a single of R246 1 strip of 3 of R249 3 complete strips of 4 of R250 Not something you run into every day.

Wading through a stockbook of 1st issue revenue stamps this morning, and I stumbled across this 10-cent Bill of Lading (R32c) with a muddy indeterminate red cancel. I nearly just passed it by, but the ink voids in the cancel looked unusual, so I thought I’d run it through retroreveal. Lo and behold, it revealed a very interesting cancel, one I’ve not seen before, from the firm of Tong Soong & Co., San Francisco. The interesting voids that had caught…

Read More Read More

We’ve discussed in the past cases where a revenue stamp was presumably affixed after the fact and backdated to the original transaction date. Frequently these cases are speculative. Here is one that is definitive. The promissory note shown below, dated October 8, 1862, is an incredibly early usage, and is arguably the earliest known use of R64a… but there’s a problem. The 60-cent Inland Exchange wasn’t delivered until December of 1862, so it could not possibly have been affixed at…

Read More Read More

Well… not exactly, but a ticket nonetheless. This is one of the most unusual items I’ve seen several years. I know I ended up overpaying for it, but it falls under that category of “when will you ever see another one?” I’ve certainly never seen one before… and may not again. It is a Civil War-era photo (Carte de Visite or CDV) depicting the grand prize in a raffle, with the CDV also acting as a raffle ticket. So what…

Read More Read More

Extending my foray into 20th century revenues, I’d been keeping an eye out for a reasonably-priced example of Scott #RVT2, the $1 trailer permit stamp. The $1 stamp is moderately scarce, valued at $650 on license. The 50-cent stamp is considerably more scarce, appearing very infrequently on the market, so I didn’t even consider that one. So the combination of a (comparably) reasonable price and a 10% eBay coupon pushed me over the edge. This particular example is on a…

Read More Read More

Sitting through a lengthy auction session or multiple days of auction sessions when being shut out completely on intended lots is a dangerous place to be for someone with impulse control issues. 😉 After a while I’ll start looking at lots through the lens of “that might be fun to look through” or “Ooh, I wonder what could be hiding in there?” based solely on lot descriptions, so I might sneak in a wayward bid if something is well below…

Read More Read More

I’ve been receiving U.S. revenue stamp circuits from both the APS and the ARA (American Revenue Association) for years now. The pickings are few and are between though, and in most cases the amount I spend on shipping the circuit on usually exceeds the amount I purchase by a fair amount, which kinda kills the bargain aspect of the circuits. I’ve been toying with the idea of stopping them, but as infrequent as the finds are, over the years I’ve…

Read More Read More

Shown below are 3 different RN-X7 receipts from the Victoria Elevator Co., used in different cities in South Dakota. They are very similar. My question concerns the third one listed. What is the second transaction that would have incurred the additional tax, thus precipitating adding the battleship revenue stamp? I couldn’t find any exact comparables online. I thought it might have to do with the fact that it’s the only one out of the 3 that is actually signed, which…

Read More Read More

But the good kind, not the parasite… unless you want to consider what it did to my wallet 😉 I already had an example of RN-A11, but only the leftmost column (bank names and the revenue imprint) rather than the full document. Both are valued in Scott, with the full document being over 4x the value of just the left column ($1,100 vs. $250). This example showed up on eBay, I made an offer, and it was accepted. It’s called…

Read More Read More

I asked several collectors’ opinions via email and got a variety of responses, but no clear consensus. My original query: Good evening, How were the black elements in type RE7 (large size type of 1942) printed? I assume the large denomination was printed on the same pass as the small lettering, correct? It seems to me that the attached RE147 (2 images, one being a closeup of the black elements) is somewhat unusual. It exhibits clear doubling of the small…

Read More Read More

The first I purchased from Richard Friedberg in 2015: The second I purchased from Eric Jackson this past January: And now a third example, found at COMPEX yesterday. Two strikes from the ship HENRY CHAUNCEY and five strikes from the ship RISING STAR. This is the only example I’ve seen that has cancels in two different color inks. The vast majority of Pacific Mail Steamship Co. straight line ship cancels are stamped in blue ink, but the RISING STAR is…

Read More Read More

… It’s a small world after all. It’s a small, small world! Philatelically speaking, that is… (And for those of you who now have that annoying Disney song running through your head: you’re welcome! 🙂 This is a bit long-winded, so please bear with the background information. One of the areas of U.S. revenues I specialize in is bisects on document. I maintain a census page on my website. Companies would bisect stamps if they ran out of the required…

Read More Read More

It’s amazing to me how sometimes seeing similar items over the years doesn’t resonate until you see more than one in close temporal proximity. I was looking through an APS circuit book shipment and saw a Scott # R82c ($2 Mortgage) with what appeared to be inking anomalies in the lower left corner. I paid it no never mind and continued onwards. In the same shipment, but in a different book from a different seller, I saw a suspiciously similar…

Read More Read More

There have been had discussions about the violet and black “F.D.” provisional handstamps that were authorized in December 1917 before officially overprinted stamps became available. However, I hadn’t seen any discussions about manuscript “F.D.” markings, somewhat to be expected, as off document there would be no way to know if they were legitimate. Additionally, while I’ve seen quite a few examples of the “F.D.” handstamps, I’d never seen manuscript equivalents… … until the item below was added to Eric Jackson’s…

Read More Read More

I spotted this on eBay last week, listed as “U.S: USED #RC20a STRIP/4 CV $240+ UNLISTED AS STRIP”. I’m not sure why RC20a isn’t listed as a strip of 4 when RC20 is listed as a strip. I hope to fix that when I submit my changes for the 2019 U.S. Specialized this summer. It doesn’t make sense to have one without the other. Current catalog value as 4 singles for RC20a is $280 (4 x $70) so the starting…

Read More Read More

I love me some Pacific Mail Steamship Co. cancels. They’re loads of fun and always in demand ($50 at the low end, up into several hundred for the scarcer ships or more dramatic multi-strike pieces). In 2014 I purchased from Richard Friedberg a very rare multi-ship piece, with three strikes of ALASKA and four strikes of ARIZONA. I surmised that these were canceled at a central office, and because the two words look similar (both begin and end with the…

Read More Read More

This one is very interesting. It is a late usage R1c on very thin translucent paper (which one would more frequently encounter on early printings not late printings) with a vertical mesh ala laid paper (see previous debates as to whether said laid paper exists on 1st issue revenues). Additionally, the surface of the back has odd impressions of circles and squiggles, almost like what you would see if someone doodled on the back with a pen without ink. I’ve…

Read More Read More

I saw this on eBay and it looked odd, so I figured I’d take a flyer on it. Scott R86c, the $3 Manifest, with a blue circular handstmp cancel, and then what upon receipt I initially thought was document offset… but now I don’t think so. There’s a large black ornately typeset boxed cancel (or what I believe is a cancel) that mirrors the company name used in the circular handstamp: Lehigh Valley Rail Road Co. The lightness of the…

Read More Read More

To quote Steve Buscemi from the movie Armageddon: “Wow, this is a goddamn Greek tragedy.” Not only did someone completely ravage documents cumulatively worth over a thousand dollars in today’s market, but they didn’t even care that they ripped through stamps in the process. What might have been some incredible exhibition pieces have been reduced to mere curiosities of nominal value. The combination usages with the Great Britain revenues, especially the one including the Nevada state revenue stamp would have…

Read More Read More

Just another piece of evidence to refute the claims that you can’t find anything good on eBay. This is an 1872 sight draft from Hamilton, Ontario to Boston, Mass., with a pair of Canada #FB51 and 2 singles of FB46 (Van Dam numbers) along with a single U.S. #R135. Documents with both U.S. and non-U.S. revenue stamps affixed are quite scarce, especially from the 1st-3rd issue era. Examples from the Spanish-American War era (1898-1901) are a bit more findable, but…

Read More Read More

I thrive on the odd and unusual, even if it’s outside my core area of 19th century U.S. revenues, so when I saw this on eBay I just had to have it. USPS presentation folders were special commemorative folders given to honored guests at USPS first day ceremonies (dignetaries, postal officials, etc.) in the mid-20th century. I have no idea if they still get produced. Usually black with gold embossing on the cover. Some contained full sheets of stamps, some…

Read More Read More

There oughtta be a law… I purchased this very item from Michael Aldrich in one of his previous auctions and subsequently returned it for not being described, along with several other items that had undisclosed faults, at which point he threatened to blacklist me from bidding in his auctions. The problem? The “few sm. margin thins” are not thins. They are facial scrapes, which are a COMPLETELY different animal. Moreover, the larger ones have been amateurly re-colored with crayon or…

Read More Read More

Just print on the stamps! It doesn’t come through on this large image, but that magenta handstamp is absolutely miniscule to fit in the margin.

I just found a second example of what I believe to be a “twisted transfer” resulting in a doubling of the frameline at top right. Note that the length and separation of the frameline doubling is larger on the first example than the second example. Bart Rosenberg has told me he has an example with doubling in the bottom lettering, but I have not seen it. If anyone has any other examples of R152 DTs, I’d appreciate seeing them.

When this lot came up at Kelleher, I decided to bid on it. I already have several examples of the 2-cent Transmississippi (#286) used improperly as revenues on documents, but zero examples of the 1-cent (#285). This lot of 4 documents had not 1 but 2 examples of the 1-cent. The first is a horizontal pair on a July 16, 1898 check from Detroit Michigan, and the other is two singles on December 26, 1898 check from Sidney, New York,…

Read More Read More

If I were an exhibitor, which I’m not, an artistic exhibit on Spanish American War patriotic revenue usages would make for a lovely visual presentation. The tough thing would be coming up with enough different examples to comprise an exhibit. I’ve kept an eye out for the last 10 years and have only managed to acquire 3 examples, the last of which just arrived this week: Patriotic stationery used for a banking transaction. My other examples: Illegal usage of R155…

Read More Read More

I *KNOW* I’ve seen an image of this inking anomaly before (different stamp), but I’ll be darned if I can track it down now and it’s faded from the depths of my memory. It’s like an oversized “I” in “I.R.”. This is going to bug me…

Express documents are always fun… because they can come with revenues paying two different taxes, only the first of which is an express tax. The later documents are taxed as ordinary receipts. But both taxes were only in effect for relatively short periods, the Express tax from October 1, 1862 to March 31, 1863, and Receipt tax from August 1, 1864 to March 31, 1865. From Mike Mahler: You know the express companies lobbied to have the original Express stamp…

Read More Read More

This one is interesting. There’s a lot going on, and some head-scratchers… enough for me to have some questions about its legitimacy. Here are the front and back of the document: I sent out the following inquiry to several revenue experts: File under “hard to fully discern from eBay images”. It’s not until you get it in hand that one can fully evaluate. See attached high-res images. On the side with the demonetized postage, it’s overpaying the tax by 1…

Read More Read More

Single examples of the 2-cent Trans-Missippi can be found used illegally as revenues, usually priced in the $100-200 range depending on the document. The example below, with a pair and two singles on a fragment of a promisssory note would have been a superb exhibit-quality item were it complete. Oh, the items that have been destroyed over the ages… the humanity! (or is it the philately!)? There’s a seller on eBay that has two separate listings of R126 ($3.50 second…

Read More Read More

Normally, I don’t ever remove revenue stamps from documents or document fragments, but I just encountered a case where removing the stamps was the prudent thing to do IMO. Shown below is an R41a multiple that I purchased on eBay. It was sold as a block of 4 plus a single, when in fact it is an irregular block of 5, making it the 4th largest known multiple per the Curtis census. It has issues though: the stamp at upper…

Read More Read More

1st-3rd issue bisects on document is one of my favorite areas to collect. I’ve been maintaining a census of bisect documents for several years. Scott lists and values bisects only in the most arbitrary manner. Their pricing is based primarily on denomination rather than actual type, and frequently bears little correlation to actual scarcity. Since they won’t adjust values unless there are reported auction sale results, and most large auction houses don’t lot bisects as single lots since the existing…

Read More Read More

Ala the Penthouse Forum of days of yore: “I never thought anything like this would happen to me…” 😉 Some of you may recall my finding an R15e (2-cent USIR on green paper) in an eBay lot back in 2014 that turned out to be genuine. I submitted it to the Philatelic Foundation and it got a clear cert. I chronicled the events and did some rudimentary research compiling an R15e census in an earlier blog post. First, let me…

Read More Read More

I don’t normally collect non-Scott-listed deep back of book material, but I do love plate and printing anomalies, especially ones with nice aesthetics. I had my eye on this one for quite some time, but simply wasn’t willing to pony up the money. Well, an opportunity presented itself to make the stamp part of a trade, which lowered the cost considerably, so I bit. Springer # TA236b, double impression. Fairly dramatic, more so than most 20th century double impressions one…

Read More Read More

Great aesthetics, but I’ve never seen revenue stamps affixed to individual bond coupons before. Redemption as part of the estate settlement? I’ve tried to find similar examples online, but to no avail. Thoughts? Response from revcollector (Bart Rosenberg): Since it is marked by the estate, it would appear that the original person to receive the money died so the money went to the heirs. That transfer is probably the reason for the tax. I have the 1898 laws put away…

Read More Read More

A new acquisition, one of the coolest revenue fancy cancels, part of a skull and crossbones on an R14c. Credit for the research on this one goes to Bruce Baryla: This ‘Skull and Bones’ handstamp was known to collectors of fancy handstamps by its appearance as a ‘sender’s mark’ on covers mailed in 1857 by the ‘Society of Twenty-Two,’ a Yale University based fraternal group associated with the famous Skull and Bones Society. This same handstamp was used years later…

Read More Read More

Purchased from an eBay seller in Germany, this is an R15c on an attractive foreign exchange with two vignettes from the European Exchange Office of C. F. Adae, a Cincinnati, Ohio banking house. Notice that all of the wording of the document is in German. Not only is there a German Prussian revenue stamp also affixed to the reverse (combination usages of both U.S. and non-U.S. revenue stamps on the same document from this era are quite scarce), but the…

Read More Read More

It’s interesting how differences between otherwise similar items don’t always present themselves until or unless you are looking at a group of those items. I was doing my normal eBay browsing, this time in stock certificates, and noticed what I saw to be an anomaly. Utilizing my Google-fu and compiling a library of images of similar certificates, it turns out it may be more rare than I initially thought. Then again, as we all know, rare doesn’t necessarily mean valuable…

Read More Read More

The Isaac’s Harbor Gold Company printed cancel is not only distinctive, but fairly scarce. It usually sells for $100-150 at retail. The only thing nicer is to find one on a document, thus confirming the attribution, in this case a stock certificate:

When I purchased this a year ago, I didn’t realize just how scarce an item it actually is; it just happened to fit into my collection of illegal usages. It turns out it’s much more scarce than I initially thought. The 2-cent Trans Mississippi (Scott 286) can be found used illegally as revenues, usually ranging from $100-250 on document. They’re not common, but can be found. I have 5 examples on documents and another single not on document. They’re out…

Read More Read More

I normally don’t do much with 20th century U.S. revenues, but I had an opportunity to purchase an accumulation of unused wine stamps originating from a winery in Ohio. No high-cat items, just lots of quantity, which provides an opportunity to view a cross section of color shades and papers. The Scott catalogue states the following: “Nos. RE32-RE55 exist in many shades.” Well, it’s not just shades, but there is also a difference in papers as well. Most were printed…

Read More Read More

If you collect revenue documents, stock certificates, etc., especially 100-200 years old, you’ll frequently encounter documents that have become brittle and split. Additionally, there are frequently issues with cut and punch cancels that make the documents susceptible to further damage in transport and handling. You want to stabilize the document while at the same time you do not want to impact the visual presentation or introduce acid-based repair materials (tape). I swear by Lineco’s “Archival Mending Tissue”. It has helped…

Read More Read More

I drove up the MSDA (Midwest Stamp Dealer Association) show in Lombard, IL today. I’ve been going for the last 4 years or so. Even though most of the dealers are ones I saw at CHICAGOPEX in November, this show is a good “follow-up” opportunity; i.e., if there was anything I passed over, this was an opportunity to pick it up, or if a dealer and I discussed material they hadn’t brought with them, they could bring to this show….

Read More Read More

I’ve had a slight change in perspective on the stamp below. I initially thought it was possibly the initials of the signatories to the document the stamp originally was on, but instead of reading it left to right, try reading it top to bottom. What you potentially end up with is: R-R-R WELSH R-R-R or: RIRIR WELSH RIRIR I think it more likely the former given the difference in stroke length between the ones at top and bottom (if they…

Read More Read More

My local show CUPEX was this past weekend. Sadly, the attendance was the worst I can recall. Other than club members, I doubt that we had 100 people through the doors over both days. One dealer said that this would be his final year attending due to the attendance, and another announced that he is retiring in the spring. Another said that this is the third consecutive show he has attended where the turnout has been abysmal. Some speculated that…

Read More Read More

This CDV isn’t all that interesting philatelically. Rather it is the front that is of greatest interest: a patriotic satire ridiculing the Confederacy that shows Jefferson Davis in a dress. The caption reads ‘Brutal attack on helpless women by the U.S. government’. The dialogue has a woman saying ‘You had better not provoke the president, he might hurt some of you’ and a Union soldier replying ‘Yer dont say’. A reply from another collector: I believe there is some truth…

Read More Read More

I’ve seen various 20th century parcel tags with revenues affixed paying parcel tax, and wanted to add an example to my collection, but never got around to picking one up. I saw this one and just had to have it. Likely not the most important usage philatelically, but It’s got great visual aesthetics and a very eclectic mix of stamps and other attributes: Scott C1 and C3 airmails. A block of four of Scott 531, one-cent imperforate. Split precancel on…

Read More Read More

A bunch of items from various sources: eBay, Siegel, and Eric Jackson auctions. First, a common stamp, R13c, but look at those jumbo margins! I’ve always liked the 1-cent Proprietary 1st issue imperf (RB1c) and have several examples. This is a margin imprint block of 6. Faulty, but most multiples are. Two additions to my fractional rate tax document collection. First is an R206 and R210 paying 4.5 cents tax on a fire insurance policy. Next is a very attractive…

Read More Read More

Despite the minefield of spurious items in the auction, there were still some pieces of interest. I was outbid on several items, but wound up with 3. First, an uncommon example of a very common stamp. A jumbo example of R5a with a blue 1863 Wells Fargo handstamp cancel. Presumably an upper-left or upper-right sheet corner position. Those side margins are so large, I’m surprised that the next stamp at right (or left) is not visible. Next, an R41a that…

Read More Read More

I haven’t been working on my revenue collection for a while, so it’s time to get back into things again… U.S. Scott R249 (red numerals) and R249a (orange numerals) both with a double transfer throughout. Not incredibly rare, but considerably more scarce than the Scott catalog values imply ($62.50 vs $50 for the normal stamp). I picked up the orange numerals example about 5 months ago and found the red numerals example on eBay 2 weeks ago. This is an…

Read More Read More

When I first started collecting U.S. revenues about 15 years ago, I neglected to follow some sage advice from my coin collecting days: “Buy the keys first!” What this means is that if you have the ability, buy the key dates or key pieces first… the rarest or highest catalog values FIRST. Most people, myself included, do the exact opposite, starting with the most common, cheapest, and/or easiest to find material. It’s the exact WRONG way to go about building…

Read More Read More

Scott #R184-189 were issued in 1900, open-numeral surcharges on gray stamp depicting an allegorical commerce statue. In 1902, a similar series was issued (R190-R194), but on green stamps and the surcharge was filled with an ornamental design. Apparently along the way they had some production issues and used the wrong surcharge on the wrong stamp, resulting in the green stamp being overprinted with the 1900 surcharge. This is listed as Scott R191a. There also was a variant with the surcharge…

Read More Read More

Same stamps as the improper usage document I got in November, but a different presentation and aesthetics. I like the magenta ‘IR’ hand scribed on each stamp; contrasts very nicely with the green.

This was a nice acquisition. The 2-cent Trans-Mississipis are findable on bank checks, and usually sell in the $100-200 range, but the other denominations are quite scarce used as revenues. This one is on a marriage license and certificate, paying the correct 10-cent tax. You can see the foxed impression of the stamp at top where it laid when the document was folded.

Just got these two in this week. This first one is a nice early usage of a tougher imperf (R36a catalogs $500). What I don’t quite get is the tax rate. A certificate tax for an incorporated company should have been 25 cents, whereas the 10-cent rate was reserved for unincorporated companies and “other” usages. From Bart Rosenberg: The reason for the ten cent tax is because the first is not a stock certificate. It is scrip for the transfer…

Read More Read More

I picked up this cover on eBay. At first glance it looks like an improper/illegal use of a battleship revenue as postage, but I don’t believe it is. It is a Spanish-American War patriotic cover sent to Germany via steamship S.S. Augusta Victoria. I believe the correct rate for the cover would have been 10 cents, so the revenue stamp was not needed for postage. Instead, in keeping with the theme of the cover, I believe the intent was as…

Read More Read More

This past Saturday dawned with the promise of higher-than-usual temperatures for December, with highs expected in the mid-60s, so nice weather to drive to a stamp show. The MSDA winter show at the Lindner Conference Center in Lombard, IL is an easy 2.5-hour drive. The show opened at 10am, so I hit the road at 7:00 just in case there were delays. Glad I did, as 3/4 of the drive was pea soup fog. 75mph through fog is all sorts…

Read More Read More

I hid in the weeds for this one on eBay, and got it for a song. This document has it all: railroad, steamship/maritime, and a pair of wonderful cancels. It is a receipt for ship transport via Merchants Navigation and Transportation Co. steamer ‘Commonwealth’ from Silas Pierce & Co. to the Boston & Providence Railroad. There is a crisp railroad receiving datestamp (unlisted in Tolman) at top right center, and then an absolutely superb ‘E.J. Smith’ script handstamp cancel tying…

Read More Read More

Sometimes fate cooperates; the timing on this is wonderful though. I picked up the following document at CHICAGOPEX, primarily because it looked like a potentially interesting cancel design that I might be able to pull out of the image. When I ran the cancel through Retroreveal, lo and behold a familar design appeared: Less than a month ago I picked up a gorgeous example of this cancel, but had been unable to determine its origin. Well, mystery solved: E. P….

Read More Read More

So many unattributed cancels… The first cancel shown below shows up every now and then. I’ve seen 3-5 examples offered over the years. The second one below showed up on eBay a few weeks ago, one I have not seen before. From a distance, the cancel almost looks like an amorphous blob or smudge, which is why presumably I was the only bidder. It’s definitely a crown though, but different from the first one. Not sure if it is the…

Read More Read More

A gentleman at the local show yesterday had two of these, that he believes to be postage improperly used as revenues. There was one with a 2-cent coil affixed, and this one with a 3-cent coil affixed, both on these partial envelope remnants and both with the same straight line handstamp. He offered me one gratis and I chose this one, as it also had the little slip shown below contained inside it. What exactly is this and what is…

Read More Read More

I never actually got around to adding to my website the 3 sheets of the best stamps that I had pulled from the Chicagopex hoard last November, the ones that I would have purchased as singles had I not been able to buy the entire collection. Included on those sheets was a lovely example of Scott # R13d, one of the tougher silk papers, less common than the $175 catalog value implies. So as I’m imaging it for the website…

Read More Read More

I don’t do much with battleship-era material, but when I see something that captures my aesthetic fancy, I pick it up. First is a document fragment from the Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway. Next is a great stock certificate from the British-American Gold Mining Co. with lengthy script handstamp cancel.

Two of my examples of R6c with the T5 major double transfer had become sulpherized, so I decided to apply hydrogen peroxide with a water rinse. The results turned out very well. Before: After: Before: After: These go well with my newest acquisition:

…as the Broadway tune goes. COMPEX was this weekend up in Arlington Heights. As with most shows up in the Chicagoland area, rather then dealing with the fustercluck of traffic and construction the day of the show, I made the 3-hour drive the afternoon before and stayed at a hotel about 10 minutes away from the show… infinitely preferable to stressing about possibly being late due to unforeseen circumstances en route. In short: I despise Chicagoland traffic. I would go…

Read More Read More

This one turned out very well, in my opinion. Not a sound stamp, but infinitely more attractive now. I bought it on eBay specifically for a soaking attempt, thinking that I might be able to improve it. Warm to hot water, a few drops of dish soap, about 3 minutes using tongs to “pull” the stamp through the water, then a rinse in clean water, and then 3 days in a Desert Magic drying book with about 30 pounds of…

Read More Read More

Amongst collectors of U.S. revenues, the straight-line handstamp cancels from the Pacific Mail Steamship Co. are very popular and highly sought-after. Each cancel is the name of a ship that was used by the company, names including amongst others: China Japan Alaska Arizona Great Republic Henry Chauncey Montana Oregonian Rising Star Ocean Queen The cancels are visually very attractive. Examples in my collection can be found here. A simplistic valuation model would go as follows: As a baseline, each strike…

Read More Read More

Two lots that I bid on this past weekend that I got completely blown out of the water on. Both went considerably higher than I expected. Scott R194 $50 on 1900 stock entittlement, Atlantic, Valdosta & Western Rwy. SCV = $1,250. Sold for $1,320 including 10% buyer premium. The certificate is dated 1900, but the stamp wasn’t issued intil 1902. So either (1) the tax was paid retroactively, (2) there was a stock transfer or other transaction, or (3) this…

Read More Read More

Here are my revenue pickups from this past weekend’s show in Indianapolis. Let’s start off with the stamps… just a few of them. First a nice jumbo example of R5c. Not bad for 20 cents. 🙂 Next, an RB2a double transfer, but a different one from the one I found a year or so ago. Here are the diagnostics from the first one and then the new one. I have read references to stitch watermarks on 1st issue revenues, but…

Read More Read More

I’ve started going through the smaller of the two hoards I bought at Chicagopex, examining for cancels, plate varieties, printing anomalies, etc. These 3 examples of R5c proved interesting. If you click on each image, it will increase to 1600 dpi. At first glance, this one looks like an inking anomaly or a kiss impression, but the doubling is prominent in some places but nonexistent in others. The next two are very similar, both double transfers not listed in Scott….

Read More Read More

Well… not exactly. I saw the part perforate pair below on eBay. It’s a moderately tough item, cataloging $250 for a single stamp and $600 for a pair. This one definitely fell out of the ugly tree and hit every branch on the way down. Stained and toned throughout. I figured I’d gamble and put in a bid, thinking that I might possibly be able to improve it somewhat. I won the pair for 10% of Scott. Not exactly a…

Read More Read More

This is one of the most misidentified stamps on the part of dealers and collectors, compounded by a lack of specificity on the part of the Scott catalog. Like R97, R13 comes in the same 3 distinct shades: blue, milky blue, and ultramarine. However, unlike the former, Scott does not have a listing for all 3 colors of the latter. Personally, I think this needs to change, but that’s a tough sell with the editors. With R13c, the blue and…

Read More Read More

This item wasn’t cheap, but I was quite happy to get it. The Walker & Taylor 10-line cancel is one of the more sought-after revenue cancels. I have several examples on R13c (2-cent Proprietary). It routinely sells for $100-150. I paid almost double the high end for this one, but IMO it’s not your normal example: The Walker & Taylor 10-line is considerably less common on 1-cent denominations than on 2-cent. The 1870 dated version of the cancel is much…

Read More Read More

I spotted this stamp in a $5.99 eBay junk lot and thought it might be legit. Upon receiving the stamp, not only was it what I thought it was, I discovered what I believe to be a double transfer at top. I confirmed with Karl Lachemacher that it is plate position 23, the Scott listed DT (there are two other plate positions that have DT, one even more dramatic than this position). So that was a nice litle bonus. Followup…

Read More Read More

The last several nights, I’ve been going through the smaller of the two bulk lots I got at CHICAGOPEX, pulling items to sell to a collector who plates various 1st issue revenues. I didn’t find anything spectacular, just a few silk papers and a few very minor double transfers. I finished up with that lot and tonight I started on the big lot. Throughout the entire 12 volumes are various and sundry stamps turned face down with pencil notations on…

Read More Read More

One just arrived yesterday and the other came back from the Philatelic Foundation yesterday, so it seemed like a good time to write about these. Full-sized images at the bottom of this post. Scott does not list any second issue imperforates, but logically speaking, since sewing machine perforated varieties are known for R112 (25 cents), R115 (50 cents), and R120 ($1.50), as well as a privately perforated gauge 8 of the R112, by extension imperforates must therefore exist. The Philatelic…

Read More Read More

Now that I’ve obtained two slightly different versions of the same cancel, I’m more intrigued than ever. Has anyone seen these before?